planning: be in organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 12 in 11 1.00
be in pgi 1.00
be in siberia 1.00
be in organisation 1.00
be 48 0.88
be for organisation 0.86
be in first place 0.79
be as 0.78
be important in counselling 0.78
be important in work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(stage, be 12 in 11) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(stage, be 48) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stage, be in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(preparation, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(stage, be 48)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(stage, be 12 in 11)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important in work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(stage, be in first place)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(stage, be 48)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stage, be 12 in 11)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stage, be in first place)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(development, be in siberia)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be as)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(stage, be 12 in 11) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(planning, be in organisation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(stage, be 48) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(planning, be in organisation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stage, be in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(planning, be in organisation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(preparation, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(planning, be in organisation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(marketing, be for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for organisation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(marketing, be as) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marketing, be as)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(development, be in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(development, be in siberia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(development, be important in counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(planning, be in organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(planning, be in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stage, be 48)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stage, be in first place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stage, be 12 in 11)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(marketing, be for organisation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(marketing, be as)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(development, be in siberia)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stage, be 48)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stage, be in first place)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(planning, be in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stage, be 12 in 11)