planning: contribute to organization success

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to organization success 1.00
contribute to success 0.94
contribute to organizational success 0.91
be important to success 0.85
help organization achieving 0.85
be important for organization 0.85
be important to success of business 0.85
be important to organization 0.85
be important to governments success 0.80
be beneficial for career advancement 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important to success)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important to success)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for organization)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help organization achieving)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(development, be beneficial for career advancement)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, contribute to organizational success)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(preparation, be important to success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(development, contribute to organizational success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(development, contribute to organizational success)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, help organization achieving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(marketing, help organization achieving)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(marketing, be important to success of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(development, be important for organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(development, be important for organization)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(development, be beneficial for career advancement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(development, be beneficial for career advancement)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(planning, contribute to organization success)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to governments success)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(planning, be important to governments success)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to governments success)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important to governments success)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(preparation, be important to success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(development, contribute to organizational success)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marketing, help organization achieving)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(marketing, be important to success of business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(development, be beneficial for career advancement)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(development, be important for organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(preparation, be important to success)