planning: is management

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.69 , stage Weight: 0.64 , step Weight: 0.62 , preparation Weight: 0.62
Siblings	marketing Weight: 0.34 , plan Weight: 0.34 , social engineering Weight: 0.33 , development Weight: 0.32 , approach Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is management	1.00
be important in management	0.95
was management change	0.92
is management function	0.88
be important to resource management	0.88
be as function of management	0.86
be important in project management	0.86
be important to human resource management	0.85
is primary management function	0.82
be as primary function of management	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(planning, is management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(marketing, was management change)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(marketing, is management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(planning, is management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(marketing, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(marketing, is management)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(marketing, was management change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(marketing, was management change)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(development, be important to human resource management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(development, be important to human resource management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(planning, is management)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(planning, is management function)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(planning, is management function)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(planning, be as function of management)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(planning, be important in project management)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(planning, be important in project management)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(planning, is primary management function)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(planning, is management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(marketing, is management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(marketing, was management change)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(development, be important to human resource management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(planning, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)