planning: is refused

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is refused 1.00
was rejected 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(plan, was rejected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(plan, was rejected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(plan, was rejected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(planning, is refused)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(planning, is refused)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is refused)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(planning, is refused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(plan, was rejected)