planning: is required

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.69
, stage
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, preparation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marketing
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, social engineering
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is required 1.00
is necessary 0.84
is needed 0.82
be necessary in system 0.78
completing work to expected standards 0.76
be necessary testing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(step, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(planning, is required)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(planning, is required)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(step, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(step, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(approach, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(plan, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, be necessary testing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(step, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(planning, is required)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(planning, is required)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(plan, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(plan, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(marketing, is necessary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(development, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(development, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(marketing, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(approach, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(approach, is needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(development, be necessary testing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(development, be necessary testing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(planning, is required)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, is necessary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(planning, is necessary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, is needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(planning, is needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(planning, be necessary in system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(planning, be necessary in system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(planning, completing work to expected standards)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(planning, be necessary in system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(planning, is necessary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(planning, is needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(planning, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(planning, is needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(planning, be necessary in system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(planning, completing work to expected standards)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, completing work to expected standards)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, completing work to expected standards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(planning, is required)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(step, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(plan, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, is needed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(marketing, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(marketing, is needed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(development, be necessary testing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(planning, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(step, is needed)