plant: flower in spring time

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.83
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.85
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.69
, apple tree
Weight: 0.67
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.67
, poison ivy
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
flower in spring time 1.00
flower in spring 0.99
flower in summer 0.95
be at spring 0.89
be at flower 0.89
has flower 0.88
flower when water 0.87
has small flower 0.85
flower in sun 0.84
be at summer 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at spring)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at summer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at flower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(apple tree, be at spring)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at spring)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(apple tree, be at flower)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at flower)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(apple tree, be at summer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(plant, flower in spring time)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(plant, flower in spring)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in summer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(plant, flower in summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(plant, has flower)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower when water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(plant, flower in summer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(plant, flower in spring)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(plant, flower in spring)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(plant, flower in sun)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(plant, has small flower)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(plant, has flower)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in sun)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plant, flower when water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(plant, flower in summer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plant, has small flower)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(plant, has flower)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(plant, has small flower)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(plant, flower when water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(plant, flower when water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(plant, flower in sun)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(plant, flower in sun)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(plant, has flower)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(plant, has small flower)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(plant, flower in spring time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at flower)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at spring)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plant, flower in spring time)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at summer)