plant: survive in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.83
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.73
, potted plant
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.59
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.85
, apple tree
Weight: 0.67
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.67
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in water 1.00
survive without water 0.94
survive under water 0.94
survive in himalayas 0.93
survive afterbotanist 0.92
survive 0.92
need survive 0.90
need photosynthes survive 0.90
survive in sea 0.89
help survive 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(plant, survive in water)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, survive without water)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, survive under water)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(plant, survive without water)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(plant, survive under water)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(plant, survive without water)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(plant, survive under water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(plant, survive without water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(plant, survive under water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(plant, survive in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, survive in water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, survive in water)