plantation: were different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.57
, real estate
Weight: 0.56
, estate
Weight: 0.53
Siblings cashew
Weight: 0.47
, national forest
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.32
, farm
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different 1.00
were in colonies different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(farm, were different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(farm, were different)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(farm, were different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(plantation, were different)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(plantation, were in colonies different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were in colonies different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(plantation, were in colonies different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(plantation, were in colonies different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plantation, were different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were different)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(farm, were different)