plantation: were located along rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.57
, real estate
Weight: 0.56
, estate
Weight: 0.53
Siblings cashew
Weight: 0.47
, national forest
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.32
, farm
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were located along rivers 1.00
were located next to rivers 0.94
were usaully located near water 0.86
were located on bays in southern colonies 0.81
were located on tidewater 0.80
were located on bays 0.79
were located on bays in colonies 0.79
is located 0.78
were in southern colonies different from farms 0.76
were in southern colonies different from small farms 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(plantation, is located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plantation, were located next to rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(plantation, were located next to rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(plantation, were located next to rivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located on tidewater)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plantation, is located)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(plantation, were located on tidewater)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plantation, were located on bays)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located next to rivers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(plantation, were located on tidewater)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located on bays in southern colonies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(plantation, were located on bays)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(plantation, were located on bays in colonies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plantation, were located on tidewater)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(plantation, were located on bays in colonies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(plantation, were located on bays in southern colonies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(plantation, were located on bays in colonies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(plantation, were usaully located near water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(plantation, were located on bays)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located on bays in colonies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(plantation, were located on bays in southern colonies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(plantation, were located on bays in southern colonies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plantation, is located)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plantation, were in southern colonies different from farms)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(plantation, were usaully located near water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were usaully located near water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located on bays)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(plantation, were in southern colonies different from small farms)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(plantation, were in southern colonies different from farms)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were in southern colonies different from small farms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(plantation, were usaully located near water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were in southern colonies different from farms)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(plantation, were in southern colonies different from small farms)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(plantation, were in southern colonies different from farms)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(plantation, is located)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(plantation, were in southern colonies different from small farms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(plantation, were located along rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(plantation, were located along rivers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(plantation, were located along rivers)