plastic: be better recycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better recycling 1.00
be separated in recycling 0.90
be recycled 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(material, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(item, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(polymer, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be better recycling)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(polymer, be recycled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(item, be recycled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(material, be recycled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(material, be recycled)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(item, be recycled)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be recycled)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be recycled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(material, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(item, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(polymer, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be recycled)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be recycled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(plastic, be better recycling)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be separated in recycling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be separated in recycling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(plastic, be recycled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(plastic, be separated in recycling)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(plastic, be separated in recycling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, be recycled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(plastic, be recycled)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be recycled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be better recycling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(polymer, be recycled)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(item, be recycled)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(material, be recycled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be recycled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(polymer, be recycled)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(item, be recycled)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(plastic, be better recycling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(material, be recycled)