plastic: be better than metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than metal 1.00
be cheaper than metal 0.92
is metal 0.88
be warmer than metal 0.88
be better than wood 0.85
be preferred over metal 0.84
be stronger than glass 0.83
be worse than glass 0.81
be chosen over metal 0.81
be stronger than paper 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than metal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(plastic, is metal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(plastic, is metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(plastic, is metal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be chosen over metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(plastic, be chosen over metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(plastic, be chosen over metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(plastic, be chosen over metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, be preferred over metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)