plastic: be better than wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wood 1.00
be better than metal 0.85
be chosen over wood 0.84
be worse than glass 0.81
be stronger than glass 0.81
be cheaper than metal 0.80
be lighter than water 0.79
be stronger than paper 0.79
be worse than paper 0.79
be warmer than metal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(plastic, be chosen over wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be chosen over wood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(plastic, be chosen over wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(plastic, be chosen over wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)