plastic: be cheaper than metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than metal 1.00
be better than metal 0.92
be warmer than metal 0.85
is metal 0.83
be preferred over metal 0.81
be better than wood 0.80
be lighter than water 0.79
be stronger than glass 0.79
be worse than glass 0.78
be stronger than paper 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(plastic, is metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(plastic, is metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(plastic, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(plastic, be preferred over metal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, be preferred over metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)