plastic: be good material for bucket

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good material for bucket 1.00
is good material used for nosecones 0.83
is good material used 0.82
is good material 0.82
be good material use 0.82
be good material make 0.81
be good material make from 0.81
is material used for nosecones 0.80
be good material making 0.79
is material used 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is good material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(plastic, be good material for bucket)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good material)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(plastic, is good material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be good material for bucket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plastic, be good material for bucket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be good material for bucket)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(acrylic, is good material)