plastic: be worse than glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than glass 1.00
be stronger than glass 0.91
be worse than paper 0.86
be better than wood 0.81
be better than metal 0.81
be cheaper than metal 0.78
be warmer than metal 0.77
be stronger than paper 0.77
be lighter than water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(plastic, be lighter than water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be warmer than metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)