plastic: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is bad insulator 0.99
is insulator 0.98
is good sound insulator 0.96
be good insulator of heat 0.96
is good electrical insulator 0.95
is sound insulator 0.95
be good insulator of electricity 0.94
is electrical insulator 0.94
is good thermal insulator 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(plastic, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(plastic, be good insulator of electricity)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(plastic, be good insulator of electricity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(plastic, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(plastic, be good insulator of electricity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be good insulator of electricity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)