plastic: is good material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good material 1.00
is good material used 0.97
be good material use 0.97
be good material make 0.96
is good material used for nosecones 0.96
be good material make from 0.95
is material 0.95
be good material making 0.93
is material used 0.93
is material used for nosecones 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(acrylic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is good material)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(acrylic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(plastic, is good material)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(plastic, is material)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic, is material)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(acrylic, is material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(acrylic, is good material)