plate: be hot at restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.64
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, implant
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dinner plate
Weight: 0.35
, petri dish
Weight: 0.35
, lasagna
Weight: 0.34
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurants hot 1.00
be hot at restaurants 1.00
be in restaurants hot 0.99
be hot in restaurants 0.99
be hot at chain restaurants 0.94
be at restaurants 0.94
be in restaurants 0.93
be at mexican restaurants hot 0.87
be hot at mexican restaurants 0.87
be in mexican restaurants hot 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot at mexican restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(plate, be hot at mexican restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at mexican restaurants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot at mexican restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)