plate: be hot in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.64
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, implant
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dinner plate
Weight: 0.35
, petri dish
Weight: 0.35
, lasagna
Weight: 0.34
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in restaurants hot 1.00
be hot in restaurants 1.00
be at restaurants hot 0.99
be hot at restaurants 0.99
be in restaurants 0.93
be hot at chain restaurants 0.93
be at restaurants 0.92
be in mexican restaurants hot 0.87
be hot in mexican restaurants 0.87
be at mexican restaurants hot 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at chain restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot in mexican restaurants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plate, be hot at restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(plate, be hot in mexican restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot at restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot in mexican restaurants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(plate, be hot in mexican restaurants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(plate, be hot at restaurants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(plate, be hot at restaurants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(plate, be in mexican restaurants hot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(plate, be at mexican restaurants hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(plate, be hot in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(plate, be hot in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(plate, be hot in restaurants)