play hockey: causes fall on ice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes fall on ice 1.00
be play on ice 0.90
be ice 0.90
requires ice 0.89
requires find ice 0.87
causes skate on ice 0.87
be play on freeze ice 0.86
requires put on ice skate 0.86
requires ice skate 0.84
ice skate 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be play on freeze ice)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be ice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be play on ice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hockey, be play on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hockey, be play on ice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hockey, be ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hockey, be ice)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hockey, be play on freeze ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hockey, be play on freeze ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires find ice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires find ice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires find ice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires find ice)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires ice)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes fall on ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hockey, be play on ice)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hockey, be ice)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes fall on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be play on freeze ice)