play hockey: causes skate on ice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes skate on ice 1.00
ice skate 0.99
requires ice skate 0.99
requires put on ice skate 0.98
requires buy ice skate 0.97
requires learn how to ice skate 0.95
be ice 0.90
be play on ice 0.90
be play in ice rink 0.90
requires learn to skate well 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be ice)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be play on ice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hockey, be play on ice)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hockey, be play on ice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hockey, be ice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hockey, be ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hockey, be play on ice)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hockey, be ice)