play hockey: requires use puck

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires use puck 1.00
requires puck 0.99
requires get puck 0.99
be play with puck 0.98
be go after puck 0.97
be go to hit puck 0.96
causes be hit by hockey puck 0.94
be play with stick and ball 0.80
requires ice skate 0.78
causes you win faceoff 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be play with puck)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go to hit puck)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be play with stick and ball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey, be play with puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hockey, be play with puck)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be go after puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey player, be go to hit puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go to hit puck)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hockey, be play with stick and ball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hockey, be play with stick and ball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires use puck)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires get puck)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires get puck)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires puck)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes be hit by hockey puck)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires puck)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires get puck)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes be hit by hockey puck)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires puck)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes be hit by hockey puck)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires puck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes you win faceoff)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes be hit by hockey puck)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes you win faceoff)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes you win faceoff)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires get puck)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes you win faceoff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires use puck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be play with stick and ball)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hockey, be play with puck)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires use puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go to hit puck)