playing: be benaficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
, intensity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings playing game
Weight: 0.36
, play
Weight: 0.36
, playing sport
Weight: 0.35
, play game
Weight: 0.34
, softball game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be benaficial 1.00
be in indore 0.88
be as charlemagne 0.79
be at starladder 0.77
is get 0.76
were viewed by certain groups 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(playing, be benaficial)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(playing, be in indore)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(playing, be in indore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(playing, be in indore)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(playing, be as charlemagne)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(playing, be at starladder)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(playing, be as charlemagne)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(playing, is get)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(playing, be in indore)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(playing, be at starladder)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(playing, be at starladder)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(playing, is get)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(playing, be as charlemagne)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(playing, is get)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(playing, is get)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(playing, be at starladder)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(playing, be as charlemagne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(playing, be benaficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(playing, be benaficial)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(playing, be benaficial)