playing: be related to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
, intensity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings playing game
Weight: 0.36
, play
Weight: 0.36
, playing sport
Weight: 0.35
, play game
Weight: 0.34
, softball game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to science 1.00
relate to science 0.90
be related to math 0.84
be scientific 0.81
be important in physics 0.78
be related to history 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intensity, be important in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be related to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(intensity, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intensity, be important in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(playing, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(playing, be related to science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(playing, relate to science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(playing, relate to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(playing, be related to math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(playing, be related to math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(playing, be related to math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(playing, be scientific)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(playing, be related to history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be scientific)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(playing, be scientific)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(playing, be related to history)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(playing, be related to history)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(playing, be scientific)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(playing, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in physics)