plug: be different in other countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, plug in
Weight: 0.55
, method
Weight: 0.54
Siblings switch
Weight: 0.32
, pump
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, toaster
Weight: 0.31
, electric blanket
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in other countries 1.00
be different in countries 0.98
be in countries 0.91
be different in country 0.87
be in developing countries 0.86
was different from other people 0.86
is different 0.83
was different from people 0.80
have different prices for different color 0.78
feel different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(feature, is different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(feature, be in countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(feature, be in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(feature, be in countries)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(feature, be in developing countries)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(feature, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(feature, be in developing countries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(feature, be in countries)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(feature, is different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(switch, feel different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(feature, is different)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(feature, be in countries)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(feature, be in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(switch, feel different)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(switch, feel different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(plug, be different in other countries)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(plug, be different in country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(plug, be different in country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(plug, be different in country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(plug, be different in other countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(feature, be in countries)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(feature, be in developing countries)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(feature, is different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(switch, feel different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(feature, be in countries)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(feature, be in developing countries)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(plug, be different in other countries)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(feature, is different)