plumbing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.62
, system
Weight: 0.62
, trade
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.34
, welding
Weight: 0.34
, heating
Weight: 0.33
, landscaping
Weight: 0.33
, boiler
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(welding, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(welding, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(welding, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(plumbing, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(welding, has quality bad)