plumbing: was accomplished in halls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.62
, system
Weight: 0.62
, trade
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.34
, welding
Weight: 0.34
, heating
Weight: 0.33
, landscaping
Weight: 0.33
, boiler
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was accomplished in halls 1.00
was accomplished in medieval halls 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(heating, was accomplished in halls)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(heating, was accomplished in medieval halls)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(heating, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(heating, was accomplished in halls)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(heating, was accomplished in medieval halls)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(heating, was accomplished in medieval halls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in medieval halls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(plumbing, was accomplished in medieval halls)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(plumbing, was accomplished in medieval halls)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in medieval halls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heating, was accomplished in halls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, was accomplished in halls)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(heating, was accomplished in medieval halls)