pneumonia: be best described as infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.73
, condition
Weight: 0.69
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.64
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.39
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.39
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.38
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best described as infection 1.00
be considered infection 0.91
be classified as infection 0.89
be classified as emerging infection 0.86
be considered secondary infection 0.85
be considered disease 0.81
be considered re-emerging disease 0.81
be considered dangerous disease 0.80
be called disease 0.79
was named pneumonia 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered secondary infection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered secondary infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, be considered secondary infection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pneumonia, be best described as infection)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pneumonia, be considered dangerous disease)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be considered dangerous disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, be considered dangerous disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be considered dangerous disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be best described as infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bronchitis, be considered secondary infection)