pneumonia: was named pneumonia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.73
, condition
Weight: 0.69
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.64
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.39
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.39
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.38
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named pneumonia 1.00
be misdiagnosed as pneumonia 0.88
be considered infection 0.80
be best described as infection 0.79
be called stomach flu 0.79
be called tuberculosis 0.78
was named 0.78
has state illness 0.77
be classified as infection 0.77
is lung disease 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has state illness)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, was named)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be misdiagnosed as pneumonia)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gastroenteritis, be called stomach flu)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, was named)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be called tuberculosis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be misdiagnosed as pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be misdiagnosed as pneumonia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be called tuberculosis)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be called tuberculosis)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(bronchitis, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lyme disease, was named)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, was named)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuberculosis, was named)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, was named)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gastroenteritis, be called stomach flu)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(gastroenteritis, be called stomach flu)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lyme disease, has state illness)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has state illness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be best described as infection)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pneumonia, be best described as infection)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, be best described as infection)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be best described as infection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lyme disease, was named)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be called tuberculosis)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bronchitis, be considered infection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, was named)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has state illness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be misdiagnosed as pneumonia)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, was named pneumonia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gastroenteritis, be called stomach flu)