pocket: be at your pant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents knife
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, purse
Weight: 0.57
, size
Weight: 0.57
, firearm
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pocket knife
Weight: 0.79
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.55
, train ticket
Weight: 0.49
, briefcase
Weight: 0.33
, pant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your pant 1.00
be a part of pair of pant 0.90
be wear under your trouser 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pant, be wear under your trouser)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pant, be wear under your trouser)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pant, be wear under your trouser)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pocket, be at your pant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be at your pant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pocket, be at your pant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be at your pant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pant, be wear under your trouser)