poetry: be more powerful than normal conversation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.64
, expression
Weight: 0.63
, medium
Weight: 0.62
, composition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.63
, poem
Weight: 0.37
, literature
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.36
, fiction
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more powerful than normal conversation 1.00
more than once 0.78
be much better than than 80s 0.78
be better than dalvik 0.76
be more ambiguous than other works 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(poem, be more ambiguous than other works)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(poem, more than once)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(poem, more than once) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(poem, more than once)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(poem, be more ambiguous than other works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(poem, be more ambiguous than other works)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(poem, more than once)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poetry, be more powerful than normal conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poem, be more ambiguous than other works)