poker chip: be at casino

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at casino 1.00
be used to play poker 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poker chip, be at casino)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(poker chip, be used to play poker)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(poker chip, be used to play poker)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(poker chip, be used to play poker)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(poker chip, be used to play poker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poker chip, be at casino)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(poker chip, be at casino)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(poker chip, be at casino)