poker: be banned in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.60
, board game
Weight: 0.58
, game
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chess game
Weight: 0.35
, gambling
Weight: 0.35
, backgammon
Weight: 0.34
, blackjack
Weight: 0.34
, hockey game
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in australia 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.91
be banned in usa 0.90
be prohibited in islam 0.79
bad in usa 0.76
uk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(poker, be banned in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in usa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(poker, be prohibited in islam)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(poker, be prohibited in islam)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(poker, be prohibited in islam)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poker, be banned in usa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poker, bad in usa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(poker, be prohibited in islam)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(poker, uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poker, bad in usa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(poker, bad in usa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in usa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(poker, bad in usa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(poker, be banned in usa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poker, uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(poker, uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poker, uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(poker, be banned in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poker, be banned in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia)