poland: is developed country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.63
, ally
Weight: 0.59
, soviet union
Weight: 0.59
, czech republic
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, britain
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed country 1.00
is developing country 0.90
is country 0.81
is world country 0.81
be considered country 0.80
was country have 0.79
is good country 0.78
be considered bad country 0.76
is second world country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(germany, is developed country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(britain, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(germany, is good country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(germany, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(germany, is developed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(australia, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(australia, is developed country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(australia, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(germany, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(switzerland, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(australia, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(britain, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(britain, is country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(germany, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(germany, is good country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(poland, is developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(poland, is country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(poland, is country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poland, was country have)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poland, be considered country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(poland, is country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(poland, was country have)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered bad country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(poland, be considered country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poland, be considered country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(poland, was country have)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poland, be considered bad country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(poland, is good country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(poland, be considered bad country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poland, be considered bad country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(poland, is good country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(poland, is good country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(poland, is good country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(poland, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(poland, is developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(switzerland, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(germany, is developed country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(germany, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(australia, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(australia, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(australia, be considered country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(britain, is country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(germany, is good country)