poland: was divided

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.63
, ally
Weight: 0.59
, soviet union
Weight: 0.59
, czech republic
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, britain
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was divided 1.00
was divided under catherine 0.83
was divided from russia 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(germany, was divided)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(britain, was divided)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(britain, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(britain, was divided)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(germany, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(germany, was divided)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(poland, was divided)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided under catherine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(poland, was divided from russia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided from russia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(poland, was divided under catherine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(poland, was divided under catherine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(poland, was divided under catherine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(poland, was divided from russia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(poland, was divided from russia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(poland, was divided)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(britain, was divided)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, was divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(germany, was divided)