polar bear: have small ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small ears 1.00
have big paws 0.78
have black noses 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bear, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(brown bear, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(brown bear, have big paws)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bear, have small ears)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bear, have big paws)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bear, have small ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, have big paws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bear, have big paws)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, have small ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bear, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(brown bear, have big paws)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(grizzly bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, have small ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(polar bear, have small ears)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big paws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(polar bear, have big paws)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big paws)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have black noses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(polar bear, have black noses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have black noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big paws)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(polar bear, have black noses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, have small ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(brown bear, have big paws)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bear, have big paws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, have small ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, have small ears)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(brown bear, have big paws)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bear, have big paws)