polarity: be in magnetic pipe work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, principle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings polarization
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, wavelength
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in magnetic pipe work 1.00
cause magnetic forces 0.79
develop across electrode surface 0.77
developed across electrode surface 0.77
be related to electromagnetic waves 0.77
be perpendicular to electric field 0.76
be in when more transformer 0.75
be in more transformer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be related to electromagnetic waves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, cause magnetic forces)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(voltage, develop across electrode surface)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, be perpendicular to electric field)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(voltage, develop across electrode surface)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(voltage, develop across electrode surface)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(magnetic field, be perpendicular to electric field)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, be perpendicular to electric field)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(magnetic field, cause magnetic forces)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, cause magnetic forces)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(wavelength, be related to electromagnetic waves)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be related to electromagnetic waves)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(magnetic field, cause magnetic forces)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(voltage, develop across electrode surface)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetic field, be perpendicular to electric field)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wavelength, be related to electromagnetic waves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be in magnetic pipe work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)