polarization: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, parameter
Weight: 0.53
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, polarity
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.33
, friction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, has state problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(friction, has state problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fragmentation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(friction, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(friction, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(polarization, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fragmentation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(friction, has state problem)