pole: have more ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more ice 1.00
have ice 0.97
be covered in ice 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pole, have more ice)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pole, be covered in ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pole, be covered in ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pole, be covered in ice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pole, be covered in ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pole, have more ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pole, have more ice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pole, have more ice)