police man: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.42
Siblings garbage man
Weight: 0.33
, firefighter
Weight: 0.32
, fireman
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.32
, elderly person
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be in australia called 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(police man, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(police man, be in australia called)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(police man, be in australia called)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(police man, be in australia called)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(police man, be in australia called)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(police man, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(police man, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(police man, be in australia)