police officer: be called coppers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called coppers 1.00
be called bobbies 0.79
be referred to to cops 0.77
act like cops 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(police, be called bobbies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(police officer, be called coppers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(police, be called bobbies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(police, be called bobbies)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(security guard, act like cops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(police, be called bobbies)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(police officer, be called coppers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(security guard, act like cops)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(security guard, act like cops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(police officer, be called coppers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(police officer, be called coppers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(police, be called bobbies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(security guard, act like cops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(police officer, be called coppers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(police, be called bobbies)