police officer: be held to higher standard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be held to higher standard 1.00
maintain high standards 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(investigator, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(investigator, be held to higher standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investigator, be held to higher standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sergeant, maintain high standards)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(investigator, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(sergeant, maintain high standards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(sergeant, maintain high standards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to higher standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sergeant, maintain high standards)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(police officer, be held to higher standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(investigator, be held to higher standard)