police officer: do job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
do job 1.00
jobs 0.78
know from experience 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investigator, jobs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(police officer, do job)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(officer, know from experience)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(police officer, do job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(investigator, jobs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(officer, know from experience)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(officer, know from experience)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(investigator, jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(investigator, jobs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(police officer, do job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(officer, know from experience)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(police officer, do job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(police officer, do job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(police officer, do job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(police officer, do job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(investigator, jobs)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(officer, know from experience)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(investigator, jobs)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(police officer, do job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(officer, know from experience)