police officer: drive in cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive in cars 1.00
leave on cars 0.85
touch back of cars 0.81
impound cars after accident 0.78
driving hondas 0.78
touch car 0.77
use squad cars 0.76
use unmarked cars 0.76
tap back of car 0.76
recognize drivers on road 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(officer, touch back of cars)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(police, recognize drivers on road)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(police, impound cars after accident)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(police, impound cars after accident)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(officer, touch back of cars)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(police, recognize drivers on road)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(officer, touch back of cars)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(police, impound cars after accident)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(officer, tap back of car)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(police, recognize drivers on road)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(officer, touch back of cars)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(police, impound cars after accident)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(police, recognize drivers on road)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(officer, tap back of car)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(police officer, drive in cars)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(police officer, touch car)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(police officer, touch car)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(police officer, touch car)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(police officer, touch car)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(police officer, touch back of cars)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(police officer, touch back of cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(police officer, drive in cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(officer, touch back of cars)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(police, impound cars after accident)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(police, recognize drivers on road)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, tap back of car)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(officer, touch back of cars)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(police, recognize drivers on road)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(police officer, drive in cars)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(police, impound cars after accident)