police officer: explain that you be in trouble

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68
, sheriff
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
explain that you be in trouble 1.00
order someone to stop run 0.76
wants to know when crime be commit 0.76
notice problem 0.76
be wrong 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(police, wants to know when crime be commit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(police, notice problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(police, be wrong)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(police, be wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(police, notice problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(police, wants to know when crime be commit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(police, be wrong)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(police, notice problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(police, wants to know when crime be commit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(police, wants to know when crime be commit)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(police, notice problem)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(police, be wrong)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(police officer, order someone to stop run)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(police officer, order someone to stop run)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(police officer, order someone to stop run)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(police officer, order someone to stop run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(police, wants to know when crime be commit)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(police, notice problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(police, be wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(police, wants to know when crime be commit)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(police, notice problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(police officer, explain that you be in trouble)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(police, be wrong)