police officer: have shave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shave 1.00
try cut 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(security guard, have shave)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(security guard, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(security guard, have shave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(police officer, have shave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have shave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(police officer, have shave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(security guard, have shave)