police officer: protect people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.76
, police
Weight: 0.76
, public servant
Weight: 0.70
, investigator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.77
, police dog
Weight: 0.73
, security guard
Weight: 0.68
, sergeant
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect people 1.00
kill people 0.78
protect guys during protests 0.78
identify people from all over world 0.76
keep us safe 0.76
kill black people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(police, kill people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(police officer, protect people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(police, kill people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police, kill people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(police, kill people)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(police officer, protect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(police officer, protect people)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(police officer, identify people from all over world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(police officer, identify people from all over world)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(police officer, identify people from all over world)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(police officer, identify people from all over world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(police officer, protect people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(police officer, protect people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(police, kill people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(police officer, protect people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(police, kill people)