policeman: be at scene of crime

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, postman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at crime scene 1.00
be at scene of crime 1.00
stop crime 0.86
wants to prevent crime 0.81
notice crime 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(witness, notice crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(witness, notice crime)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(witness, notice crime)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(witness, notice crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policeman, notice crime)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(policeman, stop crime)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(policeman, stop crime)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(policeman, stop crime)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policeman, stop crime)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, notice crime)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(policeman, notice crime)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, notice crime)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(policeman, wants to prevent crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(witness, notice crime)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(witness, notice crime)