policeman: fine person ticket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, postman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
fine person ticket 1.00
fine motorist 0.79
fine citizen 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(police officer, fine motorist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(police officer, fine motorist)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(police officer, fine motorist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(policeman, fine person ticket)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(policeman, fine citizen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(policeman, fine motorist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(policeman, fine citizen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(policeman, fine motorist)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(policeman, fine citizen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(policeman, fine motorist)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(policeman, fine motorist)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(policeman, fine citizen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(policeman, fine person ticket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(policeman, fine person ticket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(policeman, fine person ticket)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police officer, fine motorist)