policeman: slow traffic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, postman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
slow traffic 1.00
stop traffic 0.88
has authority to direct traffic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(police officer, slow traffic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(police officer, stop traffic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(police officer, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(police officer, slow traffic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(police officer, stop traffic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(police officer, stop traffic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(policeman, slow traffic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policeman, stop traffic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policeman, stop traffic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policeman, has authority to direct traffic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(policeman, stop traffic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(policeman, stop traffic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(policeman, has authority to direct traffic)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(policeman, has authority to direct traffic)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(policeman, has authority to direct traffic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(policeman, slow traffic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(police officer, slow traffic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(policeman, slow traffic)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(police officer, stop traffic)